🔗 Share this article

Iturns out Ruben Amorim could survive a loss to Grimsby. Survive an important continental showpiece against a particularly poor Tottenham teams in living memory. He withstood losing at home against domestic rivals, a lowly league position, the tactical inflexibility, laying waste to the team's best homegrown talent, a poor winning percentage, labeling the squad the worst the club has ever seen. Yet, there existed one adversary against whom Ruben Amorim would not be allowed to engage. You come at the sporting director, you had better succeed.

Regrettably, similar to numerous top-flight defender in Blackburn’s title-winning 1994-95 season, Amorim came at Jason Wilcox and appears to have missed. The most distracted of readers will notice the paradoxical situation: a coach who often railed at his players for losing individual battles crumbling in the face of the white heat and formidable presence of a England's top division's most intimidating football executives.

And frankly, this whole bruising episode seems to paint the director in a whole new light. Perhaps it might have been tempting, based on his nine months in a similar role with the Saints, to regard him as little more than a drudge within the club's structure: a man who owed his position as much to his close relationship with his former boss Omar Berrada as any verifiable talent. How wrong everyone was. By masterfully outsmarting the club's celebrated manager, just as he bested the hapless a previous executive earlier, Jason Wilcox has demonstrated as one of football's true generals: a strategic mind of which United’s competitors are now justifiably concerned.

The Tactical Clash Regarding Formation and Ideology

For example, it was Jason Wilcox , after having been part of the leadership that hired the rigid 3-4-3 advocate Amorim originally, played a key role in attempting to convince Amorim to abandon his beloved 3-4-3. Unsurprisingly, these entreaties met a certain resistance. However, such directives carry more weight when delivered by a man with the unimpeachable football pedigree of Jason Wilcox, holder of three England caps and a role in a championship team decades past.

Maybe eventually Jason Wilcox might agree to outline his thought processes to the rest of us. Maybe one day questions may arise regarding why the coach is departing with a full payout, with no compensation reduction clause activated. But Jason Wilcox speaks rarely publicly, for excellent reasons. The true intellectuals in football – individuals such as him – function on a plane beyond our own mundane comprehension. If he ever did speak, probably we would perceive is a series of ultrasonic blips and four-dimensional whirring. Desiring an explanation is not the same as being prepared to receive.

An Ultimate Authority Behind the Throne

Naturally, by focusing our attention on the sporting director we overlook the real power behind the modern United throne. Jason Wilcox is, in reality, merely executing the directives of his superior the billionaire owner, who in private has emphasized his preference for a back four. According to reports, the owner has also proposed playing Bryan Mbeumo as a right wing-back. Ratcliffe is keen for the club to embrace analytics and analytics. Per reports, in an executive meeting early in his minority ownership, he declared that the team's approach to football “shall be decided in this room”.

After all, Ratcliffe is an expert in these intricate football matters, leveraging his background in petrochemicals and yachting. Most importantly he remains immensely wealthy, and as we all know, the rich are superior: more insightful, sagacious, strategically brilliant, simply superior. Whom else could one trust to manage an enlightened programme of austerity, the construction of a modern arena that looks a lot like someone’s leftover knitting, the signing of Benjamin Sesko?

A Modern Football Order: Executives Over Coaches

This represents a shift that is becoming prevalent at the elite levels football. Historically, clubs foolishly delegated major sporting choices to low-level employees such as coaches, scouts – even footballers. Maybe previously possible for a young, innovative manager with a philosophy and energy to join an organization and see their vision through to completion. Yet how many companies have these guys established? How many large-scale layoffs have they managed? Far preferable to place the real power where it belongs: the executive class, the open-necked shirt brigade, the guys with impressive professional resumes. Better by far to determine the strategy in the boardroom and hire a coach who will adapt their methods to suit. If managers were once chefs, they have become more akin to Deliveroo drivers: not really responsible for the food, but still ultimately answerable should it be delivered poorly or leaks out of the box.

Nowadays, their job is increasingly less about defining the vision and more about marketing it: the receptionist on the front desk, the public face of an organisation they can do little to influence. Enzo Maresca leads a team of literal children into Europe and secures domestic cups, and essentially is dismissed for speaking out. Wilfried Nancy finds his standing damaged while those individuals who appointed him continue to make errors another day.

The Neoliberal Football: Responsibility Only for the Coaches

And possibly in a small way this represents neoliberalism at work: the rise of a gilded elite who are infallible, whose decisions are always sacrosanct, whose errors can invariably be sacked away without explanation. Appoint the system coach and then dismiss them for using too much that system. Bring in the project manager and later bin him for requiring too long. And most importantly show gratitude; for your modest increases in ticket costs, for the latest player acquisitions, for the reality that the grownups – however well qualified – remain in control.