🔗 Share this article

Tehran is prepared to restart nuclear discussions with the United States as long as it is approached with "respect" and "respect", Iran's foreign minister has announced.

Abbas Araghchi declared exclusively dialogue was effective, and revealed fresh requests had been made by go-betweens to resume negotiations with the American leadership. He asserted Iran had zero unreported enrichment locations, and Iran was not yet able to authorize the global atomic watchdog to inspect bombed nuclear sites for protective measures.

Navigating a Challenging Course

Araghchi is walking a challenging route since Iran aims to avoid appear to be operating from a position of weakness, and he consistently maintained that Iran had come out stronger defensively and mentally from the Israeli-US attack on its enrichment centers in June.

He was speaking at a defense forum in Tehran where he reiterated that Iran had "a fundamental entitlement to enrich uranium on home soil that it will perpetually retain" – the main reason of the deadlock in the earlier negotiations.

Earlier Talks Suddenly Concluded

The previous five rounds of discussions between the United States and Iran were brought to an abrupt and bitter termination on 12 June when the Israeli government, with American backing, struck Tehran's atomic facilities in a 12-day war that culminated with the US president declaring the facilities had been eliminated. Following this, European countries exercised their authority to reinstate global restrictions, but Iran asserts they have not had a major impact.

Ideal Resolution Offered

Iranian officials claimed they felt they had achieved a "ideal resolution" to the enrichment issue in earlier negotiations, when it was agreed an domestic cooperative with US participation could enrich uranium. Both sides would have been able to claim victory since domestic enrichment would have remained and the US could be assured that Iran's enrichment initiative was entirely non-military.

It had not been settled in the discussions that Washington's technical specialists could operate inside Iran, but that was a logical implication of the partnership suggestion. Diplomats claimed on multiple occasions they had reached agreement with Trump's special envoy Steve Witkoff only for the deal to disintegrate due to "opponents in the US".

Existing Situation

Iran's diplomats said the cooperative arrangement was now withdrawn, but it seems very probable the offer could be revived in certain ways if talks restart.

Trump last week stated he had been receiving messages that Iran sought to resume discussions, but privately Iran's diplomats state they are not yet receiving coherent offers from America either explicitly or from important Middle Eastern intermediaries, such as Qatar, Egypt, Oman and the Saudi kingdom. The Tehran's diplomatic corps has been accused of non-responsiveness in the wake of the US president's straightforward manner, but Tehran asserts diplomacy is not part of a spectacle.

Political Stance

In his address to the forum, designed to depict the US as a controlling nation that misuses the idea of worldwide standards, the foreign minister stated the 12-day war showed the dispute could not be resolved by armed force. He said the attacks started with a US demand for an unconditional Iranian surrender and culminated with an unconditional call for a halt to hostilities.

Iran is assured the opening assaults from Tel Aviv were mounted with total Washington understanding and coordination, making faith difficult to reestablish.

Dialogue Remains the Final Answer

The foreign minister said: "It was not Iran that had deserted dialogue; it was the United States and the western countries that had always attempted to dictate their will during the discussions. Negotiations can still be alive and stays the primary answer to address disagreements, but its criteria, regulations and tenets must be followed."

"If they talk to the Iranian people with the approach of respect and respect, they will receive a answer in the equivalent approach."

Restoration and Rebuilding

In what is described by Tehran representatives as the struggle of repair and recovery, the foreign minister claimed he was confident Iran's military capacities "are much stronger than prior to 13 or 14 June of this year. Every aspect of our defense have been reestablished. We acquired multiple understandings from this engagement; we have come to know our personal limitations and the vulnerabilities of the adversary."

He added: "We managed to survive this conflict. Our enrichment knowledge, which they aimed to obliterate, continues to exist. The sites and equipment, if eliminated, will be restored; what is crucial is the determination of the nation of Iran and then the social solidarity that they sought to undermine, but were unable to break. The Iranian people have become more powerful, more united, and more supportive of the administration and the state in the aftermath of this invasion."